I honestly don't care, and I don't think there is that much to spoil. Your probably either trying to figure out what on earth I am talking about, or are extremely ticked-off at me for spoiling it, and are already making death threats, and have even purchased a collection of modified Nerf guns to carry out your scheme. Oh, and he also meets a girl on the island who turns out to be his old, decrepit nannie. The story revolves around a wannabe geologist, Conner, who has a crystal that teleports him to la-la-land, where he finds dangerous O-sauruses, plants with eyes, 11 year old cannibals, and a not-so-terrifying fluffy as heck, T.rex, who I will call poofy. I'm going to use my precious time to explain what this big-boy is about, since I just jumped in without doing so: She is the only intelligent one in the whole film, aside from chocolate boy, who sees a DROMEOSAUR, and has to be told 20 times that "Yes, it was a Dinosaur", even though he was shown earlier as a expert on geology. The characters are stereotypes, and the only one you actually care about is the girl. We also have the characters in situations that are portrayed as bad, but seem so harmless, it is laughable. I will not discuss that disturbing scene. We see the main character smashing a chocolate bar into his face, and he tells us how he loves chocolate, and that he would marry it, and- OK, no more. The pacing was good, but the way characters act is pretty, well. Yes, they were child actors, but it takes away from the adventure of this movie.Ģ. However, this movie came out when fluffo-Rexes were the rage.ġ. Of course we know that T.rex was most likely NOT feathered, this can be seen as over-kill. My only problem is that the T.rex here is a fluffy as a Kiwi bird. The Theropods have feathers, and the other animals are modeled accurately. The Dinosaurs look like they should, not scaly and snake-like. The shots are beautiful, and you feel small with the giant volcanos, canyons, and jungles.ģ. Occasionally, the Dinosaurs don't fully look like their in the scene, but it's rare, and if your not actually trying to look for flaws, you won't notice it.Ģ. Of course it's not the best, but still, it looks good. The animals are mostly accurate, and have feathers. This can help you guys get a perspective of what this movie was like:ġ. So, in it's place, I'm going to make a list of what this movie did right and what this movie did wrong. "How can a movie be both?", you say? Well I truly don't know, but this movie did it, and it deserves the seemingly good movie, that can be bad at the same time, award.Īgain, like in my first review, I don't have ANY history for this film. The reason being that this movie hinges between fun, colorful, and wondrous, to boring, cheap, and lousy. This is probably going to be my first real struggle in reviewing. Dang, history does repeat itself, don't it? Well, well, well, ain't we got a nice movie to day, and it's called Dinosaur Island! Not to be confused with the 1994 B-movie of the same name, this ones got amazing CGI, horrible stereotype characters, cliché after cliché, boring plot, and crappy acting. The cash-ins part 3: Dinosaur Island(2014) NOT RATED
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |